Who are the Medes?
What Edom says
Mede, one of an Indo-European people, related to the Persians, who entered northeastern Iran probably as early as the 17th century bc and settled in the plateau land that came to be known as Media (q.v.).[1]
Let’s get some clarity on the above paragraph by asking some probing questions
- Q1. What does indo-European mean?
- A. It refers to the geographical extremes (ie places) where the languages classified as indo-European are spoken[2] specifically between “India” and “Western Europe” hence indo-European
- So the term indo-European on it’s own refers to places not people
- Q2. Who are indo-European people referred to in historical records then?
- …the people speaking an Indo-European language. They are (linguistic) descendants of the people of the Yamnaya culture (c.3600-2300 BCE) in Ukraine and southern Russia, and settled in the area from Western Europe to India in various migrations in the third, second, and early first millennium BCE.[3]
- Notice that the so-called historians consider Indo-Europeans people who speak indo-European languages and live in certain places. They do not classify them by their bloodline.
- This is an old trick the oppressor uses to insert deception into the historical records. We know this because Yahawah, the true black God of the universe, makes it clear in the bible that your identity is according to the bloodline of your father, not where you live and the language you speak. Let’s prove that!
- Numbers 1:18 KJV
- Matt 1:1-
- And we know he teaches that the oppressor is a deceiver like his father spiritual father satan
- Daniel 8:21,24-25 KJV
- Psalm 10:1-8 KJV
- But according to Esau, the so-called white man, the oppressor, satan in the flesh, indo-Europeans are people sharing a language family and a region of residence.
- Q. Who will you believe?
- Q3. Are Medes related to Persians?
- A. Using Esau’s lying definition of language and geography relation one would conclude that the Medes were indeed related to the Persians but the answer is absolutely not!
- Let’s prove that!
Medes In the Bible
Genesis 10:1-5 they are the sons of Japheth
- The sons of Japheth we can use as a barometer to easily see the truth about the Medes are Javan, Gomer, Magog and Madai.
- Gomer - associated with Cimmerians[4]
- Cimmerians associated with the Medes
- Cimmerian artifact copy notice the harpies at the top of the artifact
- Tubal - also named Tabal and Cappaodicia in the historical record
- Javan - the javanese people clearly maintain their ancestral features today.
- See also Java private tour
- Madai - Gen 10:2 sons of Japheth
- Ancient people who inhabited the land of Media[5]
- Media on the Achaemenid Empire Map
- What did the Medes really look like?
- Deioces the Mede
- Deioces was the first king of Media and the father of Phraortes[6]
- Scholar Khaleghi Motlag and others believed Hushang and Deioces to be the same person.[7]
- Texts from 4 different perspectives show common features in the identity of Hushang and Deioces most notably that they were both considered the first legislator or king of the Medes before the Persians (see footnote 7 to read about the features)
- Who is this Hushang?
- The Paradat or Pishdadian (see footnote 7 for reading)
- The Pishdadian or Paradat are mythical primordial kings of the world who have influenced the culture and identity of Iranians ie Medes. Read here
- Paradat is similar to the name of the progenitor of the Scythian[8] royal house[9]
- Founder of the Pishdadian dynasty[10]
- Son of Siyamak[11]
- An asian man!
- The Medes are asian looking people just like the rest of the children of Japheth
- Map of indo European progression - notice that the Medes are named among the indo-Europeans meaning indigenous Europeans who are the Japhites and not the Elamites
- This is further proof that the Medes are Japhites and not Persians(Elamites)
- Now that we know that the Medes are not Persians we can quickly look at who the Persians are to cement our claims.
